Governance: breaches nobody sees
Sensitive customer and financial data flows into external AI services inside everyday work. The people doing it do not know, and the people responsible cannot see it.
AI has entered the enterprise faster than the controls around it. Regulated institutions cannot answer the question their regulator will ask: how is AI used, by whom, and with what data?
An analyst downloads a credit report, pastes it into an LLM for a quick summary, and in doing so transmits personal financial data to an external server, outside every control the institution has in place.
AI agents are already running inside mainstream enterprises, touching real systems and real customer data. But the tools that deploy them were never built to answer the questions a regulator asks: what data went where, under whose authority, and can you prove it.
Second line is no longer asking whether an AI workflow works. They are asking for proof that it cannot do the wrong thing. Without that proof, sign-off stalls.
Sensitive customer and financial data flows into external AI services inside everyday work. The people doing it do not know, and the people responsible cannot see it.
There is no record of who is using AI, in which department, on what data. When the regulator, or the accountable senior manager, asks to be shown, there is nothing to show.
Token and credit consumption is compounding across teams with no visibility into which team, workflow or use case is driving it.
80% of Fortune 500 companies are already running AI agents.1 When we surveyed more than 30 regulated firms directly, the gap between adoption and oversight was stark.
already have AI agents running in production.2
are confident they have full visibility into what those agents are doing.2
are already using AI for mission-critical processes.2
1. Microsoft Cyber Pulse 2026. 2. Senni AI Agent Usage & Governance Survey, 27 May to 4 June 2026.
Without proper AI governance, financial institutions face steep penalties, and personal liability for named executives. Obligations that already applied to models and outsourcing are being extended explicitly to AI.
Sources: EU AI Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, high-risk classification Art. 6, penalties Art. 99 · DORA, Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 · PRA SS1/23 · FCA Consumer Duty (PS22/9) · SM&CR · The White House, Executive Order 14409, 2 June 2026. Provided for general information only and not as legal or regulatory advice.
Existing security tooling was built for people accessing applications, not for AI systems interacting with multiple models and internal systems on their own. Traditional controls can monitor infrastructure; Senni governs AI behaviour, data movement and model usage, creating the visibility and evidence those teams need to sign work off.
We work with risk, compliance and technology leaders in regulated institutions. Tell us what you are running and we will show you what governance looks like around it.